Legal Opinion

Greenwood v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 9, 1975No. 2548-1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

Does a person arrested pursuant to RCW 46.20.308, the implied consent statute, have the right to subject his decision to submit to a chemical test of his breath, as directed by the arresting officer, to the condition that he first be permitted to have a blood test administered by a qualified person of his choosing? That is the sole question presented by this appeal.

The trial court’s findings of fact are undisputed. The parties have stipulated that at about 9 p.m. on May 17, 1972, the respondent Greenwood was arrested near Renton, Washington, by Trooper Ronald E. Plowman of the Washington…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Zidell v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Krueger v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. State Department of Motor Vehicles v. McElwainWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. TalleyWashington Supreme Court · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API