Legal Opinion
Matsuo v. United States
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided February 21, 2006No. 05-00398 PMP-LEKPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER
PRO, Chief Judge.
This is a proposed class action challenging the constitutionality of the Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act of 1990 (“FEPCA”), which provides locality-based comparability pay to federal employees. Plaintiffs are former or current federal employees, some of whom have worked in Hawaii and Alaska. (First Am. Compl. (Doc. # 7) ¶¶ 1-16.) They accurately allege FEPCA applies only to federal employees within the contiguous United States, thus excluding federal employees in Hawaii and Alaska from receiving locality pay. 1 (Id. ¶¶ 24(a),…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smalls v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- AL Otro Lado, Inc. v. NielsenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Dettling v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- F.L.B. v. LynchDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- Matsuo v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.