Legal Opinion

Hardman v. Montana Union Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1897No. 358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the District of Montana.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action to recover the value of certain goods shipped by the plaintiff from the city of Anaconda to the city of Butte, in the state of Montana, which the defendant railway company, a common carrier between the points named, undertook to and did carry for a consideration paid, and which goods were thereafter damaged by fire while in the warehouse of the defendant company in the city of Butte. The case was tried before the court below without a jury, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties. The facts found by the court are not, therefore, open to review here.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893
  2. Wile v. Farmers' State Bank of Charter OakCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  3. Farwell v. SturgesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Judd v. New York & T. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902
  2. Bowen & Son v. Iowa Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API