Legal Opinion

Gray v. Burdin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1933No. 28916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an action prosecuted by the plaintiff Gray against the defendant Burdin and another under the workmen’s compensation act of Nebraska. From an order allowing compensation entered in the department of labor, the defendants appealed to the district court for Hall county, where on hearing de novo the plaintiff’s petition was denied. He now appeals to this court.

In this proceeding the plaintiff Gray’s petition filed with the department of labor on December 14, 1932, sets forth as the basis of recovery certain accidental injuries suffered by him on February 24, 1928, arising out of and in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State ex rel. Kennedy v. BroatchNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Stromberg Motor Device Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Roller v. MurrayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chilen v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Gilmore v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Spratt v. Crete Carrier Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Riedel v. Smith Baking Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Spratt v. Crete Carrier Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API