Legal Opinion

State v. Wingard

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 19, 1994PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WADE, Judge.

The defendant, James G. Wingard, appeals from his conviction for felony escape. The trial court imposed a Range II sentence of three years to be served consecutively to his prior sentences.

On appeal, the defendant presents the following issues for our review:(1) whether the trial court should have allowed as evidence what occurred after his arrest for escape;(2) whether the trial court erred by allowing his prior felony convictions as evidence; by failing to properly instruct the jury as to the convictions; and by failing to grant a mistrial based upon the introduction of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. HowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. The United States of America v. Dennis L. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. State v. KilburnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SHIRA JEAN STAFFORDCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  5. State of Tennessee James Allen JenkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API