Legal Opinion
Hang Kannha Yuk v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 20, 2004No. 02-9546PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners, all members of the same extended family, are natives and citizens of Cambodia. 1 Mr. Yuk is the lead petitioner, and the asylum applications of the others rely on essentially the same facts as his. 2 They seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Petitioners entered the United States between March and June 1997, each with authorization…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gerardo Bibiano Falcon Carriche Theresa v. De Falcon Carriche and Christina Pamela Falcon Bibiano v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Yu Sheng Zhang v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Joseph Ngure v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Sead Pilica v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Uanreroro v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Sidabutar v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.