Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Retail Clerks' Assn.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1918No. Civ. No. 2523PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. P. F. Gosbey, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff herein sought and obtained an injunction against defendants, the Retails Clerks’ Association and others, preventing them from harassing or obstructing him in the operation and conduct of his business. Being dissatisfied with the form and extent of the judgment, plaintiff has appealed therefrom, and he claims that such judgment does not afford him the particular and specific relief prayed for" by him in his complaint, and that it is not as favorable to Mm as the findings of the court warrant.

The record consists of the judgment-roll alone. The complaint charges that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Pierce v. Stablemen's Local 8760California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. A. R. Barnes & Co. v. Chicago Typographical Union No. 16Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Goldberg, Bowen & Co. v. Stablemen's Local 8760California Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. GeeU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McKay v. Retail Automobile Salesmen's Local Union No. 1067California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Lisse v. Local Union No. 31California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In Re LyonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. S. Cal. Iron & Steel Co. v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Iron, Steel & Tin WorkersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Thomas v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API