Legal Opinion
Homer F. v. Jeremiah E.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 2009No. 28,694PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} Grandparents filed a petition to adopt Father’s child (Child) and served Father with a motion to imply his consent to the adoption. After two separate hearings on the matter, two orders were entered — one in December 2006 (2006 order) and another, amended order in June 2008 (2008 amended order)— implying Father’s consent to the adoption of Child. Father filed an application for interlocutory appeal of the 2008 amended order, which was granted. On appeal, we necessarily examine the effect of the 2006 order and conclude that the 2006 order was a final, appealable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Smith v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Trujillo v. Hilton of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- In the Matter of Pamela AGNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Pamela R.D.G.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Santa Fe Pacific Trust, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Adoption of Homer F.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Aduz v. OjiakuNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014