Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Nessmith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 3, 1967No. 41560PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This appeal involves an action instituted by defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff”, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., from plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as “defendant”, on account of personal injuries he allegedly suffered while employed by said defendant as a welder’s helper, on September 27, 1962.

When allegedly injured, plaintiff and his foreman, Mr. W. C. Dye, employed by defendant as a “frog”, or switch, repairman, were removing the angle bars joining sections of defendant’s railroad track,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  2. Preston A. Parkinson v. The California Company, a Corporation and Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. Hatten R. Co. v. Baylies Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Loomis v. ChurchIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MashoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. DrumbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Shepherd v. St. Louis-San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. Townsend v. Dollar General StoreCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API