Legal Opinion
Kolander v. Weeks
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 26, 1996No. Civil No. 95-1094-MAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARSH, Judge.
Plaintiff filed this § 1983 action claiming that the State of Oregon Adult and Family Service’s policy of denying certain deductions violates the Food Stamp Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2011 et seq., and applicable food stamp regulations. Defendant moves to dismiss, claiming that an administrative ruling regarding plaintiffs 1994 food stamp allotment and requested deductions has preclusive effect on her 1995 claims. For the reasons which follow, defendant’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Cheryl Kolander is a self-employed silk dyer, working out of her home. In April…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Kansas, ex rel. Delia Garcia, Secretary o v. JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
- State of Kansas, ex rel. Lana Gordon, Secretary of v. BaileyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
- Trees v. Service Employees International Union Local 503District Court, D. Oregon · 2025