Zugar v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
The exception to the judgment striking the plea in abatement will be first considered, and if the court erred in striking this plea all subsequent proceedings were nugatory.
The rule of procedure for the return of indictments at common law and in this State until the decisions in Davis v. State, 74 Ga. 869, and Danforth v. State, 75 Ga. 614 (58 Am. R. 480), was that the members, of the grand jury would bring such indictments into court, where the clerk of the court called the names of the jurors, who answered to signify their presence, and thereupon the foreman of the jury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Danforth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Renigar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
- Barlow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Sampson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Bowen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
3Cited by20 opinions
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Blevins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Cadle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.