Legal Opinion
Haynes v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 14, 1986No. 84-1590PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal arises from a forfeiture action brought by the District of Columbia pursuant to the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, D.C.Code § 33-552(a) (1985 Supp.), which authorizes the forfeiture of any vehicle used to transport controlled substances (i.e., illegal drugs) or any “raw materials, products, and equipment of any kind which are used, or intended for use, in manufacturing, compounding, processing, or delivering any controlled substance....” The subject of the forfeiture action was a 1976 maroon Cadillac allegedly owned by appellant Haynes. The trial court entered a default decree…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Braxton v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re C. A. P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ungar Motors v. AbdemoulaieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- White v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Futrell v. Department of Labor Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Plough, Inc. v. National Academy of SciencesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Flemming v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Carl v. Children's HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hinkle v. Sam Blanken & Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.