Lowenberg v. Illinois Mutual Life Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRANK LOWENBERG, et al., Case No. 21-cv-09739-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 ILLINOIS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE Re: Dkt. No. 16 COMPANY, 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss, which is fully briefed. Dkt. 14 Nos. 16 (“Mot.”), 35 (“Opp.”), 43 (“Reply”).1 The Court finds this matter appropriate for 15 disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For 16 the reasons…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.