Legal Opinion

CareFirst of Maryland, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 14, 2026No. 2:23-cv-00629Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division CAREFIRST OF MARYLAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:23-cv-629 JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. OPINION & ORDER Before the Court are Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech, Inc.’s (together, “J&J”) motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 823) of the Court’s summary judgment order (ECF No. 794), and J&J’s motions in limine No. 3 (ECF No. 667) and No. 9 (ECF No. 673). For the reasons stated herein, J&J’s motion for reconsideration is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; its motion in limine…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. American Canoe Ass'n v. Murphy Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  5. Carrie A. McMellon Lori Dawn White Kathy D. Templeton Cheri Call v. United States of America United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API