Legal Opinion

Nash v. Burchard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Kent. (Grove, J.) Bill for an accounting, and for a receiver. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOhamphh, C. J.

This case comes before us upom demurrer to the complainant's bill.

The complainant is Homer W. Nash, of the city of.' Detroit, and he files this bill of" complaint against the-defendants, the principal statements contained therein being as follows:

1. That prior to the year 1882, and up to June 23,. 1882, there had existed a firm known and called 0.. Burchard _& Co., which was engaged in the business of' making and vending men’s clothing in the city of Grand Bapids, which firm was composed of Mary E. Burchard and Frederick Lyon; that the firm of Burchard & Co. sold out the business and stock in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Finlaw, Mueller & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Teeter v. TeeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Vosburgh v. MiddleditchMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Ellis v. Southwestern Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API