Legal Opinion

People v. Kennie

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1985No. Docket 81942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether a remand for resentencing is required where the sentencing information report (SIR) prepared by the probation department contains a recommended minimum sentence range erroneously calculated under the sentencing guidelines. We hold that a remand is required only where the defendant has preserved this issue for appellate review by specifically objecting to the error at sentencing or by filing a motion to vacate the sentence prior to filing an appeal. Since defendant in this case failed to do either, we decline to remand for resentencing and we affirm.

D…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FlemingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. RidleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. MacKMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. LoveMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. HartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. WilsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. LatzmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. KisielewiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API