Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Krule

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2000No. M.R 16045Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE MILLER,

specially concurring:

I agree with the majority that the petitioner’s application for admission to the bar of this state must be denied. I write separately to explain more fully the basis for my agreement with that determination and to respond to Justice McMorrow’s dissent in this case.

As the majority recounts, the petitioner, while a licensed insurance professional, took part in an extensive scheme to systematically defraud insurance companies. The petitioner took a job in the office of a person who owned taxi cabs. Whenever a driver was involved in an accident, the petitioner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re BerkleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re AlexanderIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re RothenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re ChildressIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re RichmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API