Legal Opinion · Dissent

Prock v. Bull Shoals Boat Landing

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 27, 2014No. CV-12-73Published

1DissentCourtney Hudson Goodson, Justice

Quite simply, this case involves judicial review of a question of fact. The majority’s opinion represents a significant departure from this court’s traditional review of workers’ compensation cases. The decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission that Prock failed to meet his burden of rebutting the statutory presumption is undoubtedly supported by substantial evidence. In concluding otherwise, a majority of this court fails to adhere to the well-established standard of review, and in doing so, it usurps the authority of the Commission to determine the true facts. Therefore, I…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. J. L. Williams & Sons, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Birchett v. Tuf-Nut Garment Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Brower Manufacturing Co. v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Scarbrough v. Cherokee EnterprisesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API