Legal Opinion
State v. Chiles
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided May 31, 1996No. 74,075PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
ABBOTT, J.:
The defendant, Anthony D. Chiles, appeals the Sedgwick County District Court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3504, alleging that the Habitual Criminal Act, K.S.A. 21-4504 (Weeks), was improperly used to enhance his sentence and that he was improperly convicted of and sentenced for the crime of unlawful possession of firearm. The defendant contends that the sentence enhancement and the firearm conviction were improper because the underlying crime they were based upon was invalid as he was never…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. VeikosoHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. WeberIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Jacob A. KanatzarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.