Legal Opinion

New York Municipal Railway Corp. v. Intercontinental Construction Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1921Published

Action for damages for breach of contract and to recover upon surety’s bond.

1Opinion of the CourtLazansky, J.

Action for damages against defendant contractor for failure to complete the work provided for under the contract, and against the defendants .surety *343companies on their bonds for the faithful performance of the contract by the contractor — each defendant in the sum of $50,000. The defendants surety companies defend on the claim that they are discharged from their obligations because plaintiff instead of making monthly payments to the contractor on monthly estimates, as provided for by the contract, during certain months preceding the contractor’s default made weekly payments to it. Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Kincaid v. . DwinelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. St John's College v. . &198tna Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Vose v. . the Florida Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Merrill v. ReinersNew York Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API