Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Reiners

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action of foreclosure.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

The land being owned by defendant Conklin, he made a mortgage thereon to defendant Bischoff for $3,000, dated November 1, 1894, to secure the payment of Ms bond for that amount, due on demand. He afterwards conveyed the land to defendant Reiners, subject to the mortgage. Later, viz., on November 12, 1894, he entered into a written agreement with Reiners by which the payment of the bond and mortgage was extended to November 1, 1895,-and Reiners agreed to pay the same. - Afterwards Reiners conveyed the *584land to defendant Thompson, subject to the mortgage,vtnd Thompson conveyed to defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calvo v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Elwood v. DeifendorfNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Neimcewicz v. GahnNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. Ducker v. . RappNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alropa Corp. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Feigenbaum v. HizsnayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Blumenthal v. SerotaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  4. Keeler v. HollwegNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Magnus Beck Brewing Co. v. SetelNew York Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API