Legal Opinion
Gelman v. Buehler
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 2013PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Graffeo, J.
Partnership Law § 62 (1) (b) states that a partnership formed by oral agreement may be dissolved unilaterally if “no definite *536term or particular undertaking is specified” in the underlying agreement. Because the parties in this case did not sufficiently address either of these provisions in their oral contract, we conclude that there was no breach of contract when one party withdrew from the enterprise.
According to the allegations in the complaint, which we must accept as true, plaintiff Geoffrey Gelman and defendant Antonio Buehler were recent business school…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Scholastic, Inc. And Scholastic Productions, Inc. v. Robert Harris and Harris Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Willman v. BehelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Fischer v. FischerKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Girard Bank v. HALEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Congel v. MalfitanoCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
- Congel v. MalfitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Gural v. DrasnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- CIP GP 2018, LLC v. KoplewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Gural v. DrasnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.