Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, No. 1
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurrence
GRABER, Circuit Judge,
specially concurring.
I concur specially because the racial tiebreaker that Seattle School District No. 1 uses to assign some public high school students to desirable schools plainly “grant[s] preferential treatment” to those students on the basis of their race, in violation of Initiative 200, which is codified as Washington Revised Code § 49.60.400 (“I-200”).1 Nothing in the United States Constitution or the Washington Constitution forbids the citizens of Washington from enacting a law like 1-200 or requires that the law be interpreted to allow a racial tiebreaker in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Katuria E. Smith Angela Rock Michael Pyle for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. University of Washington, Law School Wallace D. Loh Sandra Madrid Richard Kummert Michael Townsend Roland Hjorth, and Robert Aronson John Junker Jacqueline McMurtrie Eric Schnapper Janet Stearns, Katuria E. Smith Angela Rock Michael Pyle v. The University of Washington Law School, Katuria E. Smith Angela Rock Michael Pyle v. The University of Washington Law School Wallace D. Loh Roland Hjorth Sandra Madrid Richard KummertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Clark v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.