Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Napier Electric & Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided July 7, 1978No. 76-316, 76-348PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GANT, Judge.
The corporate appellee contracted to construct the sewer lines, water lines and a sewage treatment facility for Woodson Bend, Inc., near Somerset, Kentucky. Appellant, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, was surety on two bonds for the corporate appellee, one being a Labor and Material Payment Bond in the face amount of $778,000, obligating the appellant to pay all materialmen and suppliers should the appellee default; the other being a Performance Bond, binding the appellee to complete the project in the event of default. As a part of the consideration for writing this and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Glenn H. Engbrock, Glenn H. Engbrock, Inc. And Encon Construction, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- National Surety Corporation v. Peoples Milling Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944
3Cited by23 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- PSE Consulting, Inc. v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Fallon Electric Co., Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, Third-Party v. Ravin, Inc. Ralph P. Murovich Darlene A. Murovich, Third-Party Appeal of the Cincinnati Insurance Company, No. 96-3559. Corey Food Service Equipment, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, Third-Party v. Ravin, Inc. Ralph P. Murovich Darlene A. Murovich, Third-Party Appeal of the Cincinnati Insurance Company, No. 96-3559Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Hartford v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
- Gulf Insurance v. AMSCO, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.