Legal Opinion

(PS) Bergum v. Sacramento County DHHS

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 19, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00058Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KRISTY BERGUM, No. 2:19-cv-58-TLN-EFB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY DHHS CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES; 15 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; PARENT ADVOCATES 16 OF SACRAMENTO, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915.1 Her 20 declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. 21 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 22 Determining that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API