Legal Opinion
Megin v. Carney
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 31, 1961PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment rendered upon a verdict for the defendant in an action of malpractice. Four of the assignments of error have been briefed and argued. Three of them concern claimed errors in the charge to the jury. The fourth pertains to a ruling upon evidence. Other assignments of error are treated as abandoned. State v. Ferraiuolo, 145 Conn. 458, 459, 144 A.2d 41.
In his request for a finding, the plaintiff did not state distinctly, in accordance with our rules and practice, the questions of law which he desired to have reviewed, but instead questioned whether the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Casalo v. ClaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Salvatore v. HaydenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Borsoi v. SparicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Maggi v. MendilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. FerraiuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Krattenstein v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Gosselin v. PerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. MahmoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.