Simpson v. Colonial Parking, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Justice:
Robert E. Simpson (“Simpson”), the plaintiff-below, appeals from the Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in a personal injury tort action in favor of the defendant-below, Colonial Parking (“Colonial”). Simpson claims that the Superior Court erred by holding that he was a trespasser, and not a licensee, when he used Colonial’s parking lot as a short cut while riding his bicycle. Because commercial property owners/occupiers are held to the same common law standard whether or not the claimant is a licensee or a trespasser — namely, to refrain from willful and wanton…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. GeierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Maher v. VossSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Berns v. DoanSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- DiSabatino Brothers, Inc. v. BaioSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
- Acton v. Wilmington and Northern R. Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Biggs v. HallSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021
- Chase v. WAP Cleveland Avenue, L.L.C.Superior Court of Delaware · 2017