Legal Opinion
Gray v. Seterus, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 8, 2017No. Civ. No. 6:13-cv-1805-MCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McSHANE, Judge:
For the reasons set forth below, Defendant Fannie Mae’s Motion for Summary Judgment [# 91] is GRANTED in part, Defendant Seterus’ Motion for Summary Judgment [# 95] is GRANTED in part, and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [# 96] is DENIED. Defendant Fannie Mae is dismissed as a party to this lawsuit. A three day bench trial for the remaining claims against Defendant Seter-us is set for June 12, 2017.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Norman &-Lawana.Gray filed this action against defendants Seterus, Inc. and the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), seeking…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Faiella v. Fed. Natl Mortgage Assoc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Best v. Newrez, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Faiella v. FNMADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017