Legal Opinion

Spikes v. Sassnett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1917No. 7881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

■ Trover; from city court of Dublin.—Judge Hicks. June 15, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. Where a person left a certain number of stalks of sugar-cane in a bed, and another person, without consent of the owner, took up the cane and planted it, and subsequently the parties agreed that the cane should be cultivated by the one planting it, and that the original owner could “come and get her one-half of it in the fall,” trover would not lie against the person who planted it, for “about twenty-five hundred stalks of sugar-cane raised on a certain patch grown by” him, where there had been no segregation of these twenty-five hundred stalks from the whole amount raised, so as to render…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Camp v. CaseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Tompkins v. PhippsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ellis, McKinnon & Brown v. HoppsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Graham v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  3. Hammock v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Graham v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API