Beddo v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters'’ statement of tbe case: The specific facts relating to the different motions are set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bichaedson, Ch. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court:
The only controversies in this case at the present time are among attorneys and others as to the distribution of fees to be allowed, and as to the right to appear as attorneys of record.
The original petition was made and filed March 6,1891, by Joseph Daniels, who died April 12, 1892.
In 1888 said Daniels and Thomas Ball, attorneys of this court, and Isaac B. Hitt, not an attorney of this court, entered into a written agreement for the prosecution of certain Indian depredation claims and to share alike in all fees agreed to be paid by the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- National City Bank of Evansville v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- The Sisseton and Wahpeton Bands or Tribes v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Godfroy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.