Legal Opinion
Martin v. Houston
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided April 6, 2016No. CASE NO. 2:14-CV-905-WKWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
W. Keith Watkins, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the court is Defendant Randall V. Houston’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (Doc. #25), which has been fully briefed. Upon consideration of the pleadings, the arguments of counsel, and the relevant law, the motion will be denied.
I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
Subject-matter jurisdiction is exercised pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, 2201, and 2202. The parties do not contest personal jurisdiction or venue.
II. STANDARDS OF REVIEW
When evaluating a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martin v. HoustonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
- Thai Meditation Ass'n of Ala., Inc. v. City of MobileUnited States Circuit Court · 2018
- Thai Meditation Association of Alabama, Inc. v. City of Mobile, AlabamaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018