Wiegand v. Wiegand
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order granting a husband a divorce. The testimony was taken by a master, who recommended that the husband “be awarded a divorce . [on the ground] that he has suffered a constructive desertion, to wit, that [his wife] locked him out of his house without justification and without his consent, and that further her refusal to let him return persisted for a period of *74two years.” Master’s report at 7. The lower court stated that “after an independent review of the evidence de novo . [citations omitted] we see no reason to disagree with the findings and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- McKrell v. McKrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Nacrelli v. NacrelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Smith v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Mathias v. MathiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.