Legal Opinion

Hollister v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 12, 1940No. 44015PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Chief Justice

Plaintiff, now a lieutenant, senior grade, United States Navy sues to recover $464, rental allowance for the period from July 1, 1936, to February 22, 1937, while serving at -Coco Solo, Canal Zone. At all times herein involved plaintiff was a lieutenant, junior grade, and had with him a dependent wife and child. During the period of the claim plaintiff was not assigned quarters at Coco Solo by the Naval Commanding Officer for the reason that none were available and plaintiff, upon his own request and with permission of the Army officer in command thereof, occupied Quarters 3-C at France…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Odell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1903
  2. Francis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  3. Taxis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Day v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. AntonelliU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. EvansU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  5. Cornell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API