Legal Opinion
Bryan Lustig, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. Daniel Markus, Inc. (D/B/A Perfect Pawn), Daniel Risis, Margarita Risis and Oleg Niezvestny
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 20, 2025No. 2:20-cv-00379Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY BRYAN LUSTIG, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 2-20-cv-00379-WJM-SDA Vv. (Consolidated Case No, 2:22-cv-00161) DANIEL MARKUS, INC. (D/B/A PERFECT | OPINION _ PAWN), DANIEL RISIS, MARGARITA RISIS AND OLEG NEIZVESTNY, Defendants. WILLIAM J, MARTINI, U,S.D.J.: Plaintiff Bryan Lustig brings this collective action against Defendants Daniel Markus, Inc. d/b/a Perfect Pawn (“Perfect Pawn’), Daniel Risis (“Mr. Risis”), Margarita Risis, and Oleg Niezvestny,! Plaintiff alleges that Defendants withheld wages…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol Aman Jeanette Johnson v. Cort Furniture Rental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Enterprise Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litigation v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United States v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Smith v. Johnson and JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.