Legal Opinion

Corman v. Relax Saunas

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 15, 2025No. 3:24-cv-02191Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Erika Corman, Case No. 3:24-cv-2191 Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Relax Saunas, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Relax Saunas moved to dismiss this case for improper venue. (Doc. No. 7). Plaintiff Erika Corman opposed the motion, (Doc. No. 8), and Defendant filed a brief in reply. (Doc. No. 9). For the reasons stated below, I deny Defendant’s motion. II. BACKGROUND Erika Corman worked for Defendant, a company based in Columbus, Ohio, in several capacities during several nonconsecutive time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First of Michigan Corporation Michael Sobol v. Carlton Bramlet Dolores M. BramletCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Setco Enterprises, Corporation v. Denzil W. Robbins, Roberta A. Robbins, Setco Enterprises, Corporation v. Denzil W. Robbins, Roberta A. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. Audi AG & Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. IzumiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  4. Reilly v. MeffeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  5. Shay v. Sight & Sound Systems, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API