Legal Opinion

Central Iron & Coal Co. v. Coker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 28, 1928No. 6 Div. 976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, j.

This is the second- review, by certiorari, in this ease, and whether such review is authorized is a question not presented, as no objection is made here by the respondent. The case as reported on the former appeal will be found in Ex parte Central Iron & Coal Co., 212 Ala. 367, 102 So. 797, where a summary of the facts, as they then existed, may be found, and the question presented was stated to be that:

“We are here concerned only with the power -of the court over the matter of apportionment of the compensation previously fixed,.and which is not sought to be changed.”

The facts of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. Ex Parte Todd Shipbuilding & Dry Docks Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Ex Parte Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tombrello Coal Co. v. FortenberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Woodward Iron Co. v. VinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Ex Parte JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Davis v. Birmingham Trussville Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Montaner v. Comisión Industrial de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API