Legal Opinion
Caruso v. Cavalry Portfolio SVCS
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 30, 2019No. 3:19-cv-01224Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC CARUSO, Case No.: 19-CV-1224-CAB-AHG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS 13 v. 14 CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SVCS et al., [Doc. Nos. 11, 13, 19, 23] 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Before the Court are Defendants Portfolio Recovery, Hunt & Henriques, Mercantile 20 Adjustments Bureau, Trans Union LLC, and Experian Information Solutions Inc.’s 21 (collectively “Defendants”) motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint. [Doc. Nos. 11, 13, 22 19, 23.] The Court deems the motions suitable for determination on the papers…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.