Legal Opinion

Reed v. Interstate Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1907No. 5324; No. 2964 C. APublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Comity .Court of the City and Comity of Denver. Hon. Ben B. Lindsey, Judge. Action on a note by Tbe Interstate Oil Company against Clinton Reed. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

There have been two trials of this action, one before a justice of the peace, the other in the county court, each resulting unfavorably to defendant, who is here with his appeal from the last judgment.

The abstract is indefinite and unsatisfactory, perhaps, in a measure, due to like conditions of the transcript. Although the evidence, as abstracted, does Hot clearly or definitely show the nature of the demand on which the action is based, or the issues involved, opposing counsel apparently are in accord that the action is one by the payee of an overdue promissory note against the maker, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Thomas v. CareySupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. Adams v. TuckerColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Sears v. HicklinColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Blackmore v. NealeColorado Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van Diest v. TowleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Dern v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Hathaway v. BottenfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API