Legal Opinion

Ragland v. Swindell Dressler Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 17235PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.'

In the course of pretrial consideration of the above common law diversity negligence action arising in Pennsylvania, the following question is posed:

Where plaintiff sues multiple defendants, one of whom is plaintiff’s statutory employer, is said statutory employer. a proper party to remain in the action where plaintiff makes no objection to its dismissal but where the other multiple defendants resist said dismissal?

Succinctly stated:

A sues B, C, and D.

B is A’s statutory employer.

B moves for dismissal to which A makes no objection.

C and D resist dismissal.

Defendants are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Young v. Wilky Carrier CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  3. McIntyre v. STRAUSSERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Jerry Girardi v. Lipsett, Inc. (Andershonis, Inc., Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  5. Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burns Construction, Inc. v. Valley ConcreteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Siegel v. SlaneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. Plasterer v. HahnDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Siegel v. SlaneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API