Ragland v. Swindell Dressler Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, Chief Judge.'
In the course of pretrial consideration of the above common law diversity negligence action arising in Pennsylvania, the following question is posed:
Where plaintiff sues multiple defendants, one of whom is plaintiff’s statutory employer, is said statutory employer. a proper party to remain in the action where plaintiff makes no objection to its dismissal but where the other multiple defendants resist said dismissal?
Succinctly stated:
A sues B, C, and D.
B is A’s statutory employer.
B moves for dismissal to which A makes no objection.
C and D resist dismissal.
Defendants are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Young v. Wilky Carrier CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- McIntyre v. STRAUSSERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Jerry Girardi v. Lipsett, Inc. (Andershonis, Inc., Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burns Construction, Inc. v. Valley ConcreteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Siegel v. SlaneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Plasterer v. HahnDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Siegel v. SlaneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969