Plasterer v. Hahn
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
In this section 1983 action for violations of an inmate’s Eighth Amendment rights based'upon deliberate indifference to his medical needs, defendant, Malcolm D. Weiss, D.O. (Weiss), has moved, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), for dismissal of plaintiff’s amended complaint against him. Plaintiff joins in the motion but the other defendants, except James Mulligan, M.D., oppose it. The defendants who object make two arguments worthy of discussion. They contend first that a defendant may not proceed under Rule . 41(a)(2), and that Weiss’s motion must therefore…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith, Kline & French Laboratories v. A. H. Robins Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Young v. Wilky Carrier CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Southern Electric Generating Co. v. Allen Bradley Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Fair v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ProtoComm Corp. v. Novell Advanced Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Disabled in Action of Pennsylvania v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004