Legal Opinion

Schwank v. Lamountain

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 30, 2009No. C.A. No. WC07-0370Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

Before this Court are the cross-motions for partial summary judgment of Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs Joseph LaMountain, Earl LaMountain, and Elizabeth LaMountain ("the LaMountains") and Third-Party Defendants Tim Hortons (New England), Inc. ("Tim Hortons) and Ace American Insurance Company ("Ace"). The LaMountains and Tim Hortons dispute whether Tim Hortons's insurance policy with Ace covers a slip and fall incident which occurred in a parking lot owned by the LaMountains and located immediately outside a Tim Hortons store. For the reasons set forth below, this Court now…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Palmisciano v. Burrillville Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  2. Estate of Giuliano v. GiulianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. Mallane v. Holyoke Mutual Insurance Co. in SalemSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  4. Lynch v. Spirit Rent-A-Car, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  5. Wirth & Hamid Fair Booking, Inc. v. WirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API