Legal Opinion

United States v. Burk

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2013No. 12-3256UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

DAVID M. EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Richard Burk seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”), see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), in order to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Burk pled guilty to one count of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and was sentenced to 189 months in prison. That sentence fell within Burk’s advisory guideline range of 168 to 210 months in prison. At sentencing, Burk unsuccessfully moved for a below-guideline sentence. In his § 2255 motion,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. HollisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elliott v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API