United States v. Hollis
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
We granted a certificate of appealability (COA) to determine whether the district court erred in dismissing Gary Jack Hollis’s claim that his criminal sentence should be vacated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He claims that his appellate attorney provided constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to contest his sentence under the holding of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Having considered this issue in light of the entire record, we affirm. 1
I
In 1998, a federal jury found Mr. Hollis guilty of one count…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. McGaughyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. LymonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. BurkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.