Legal Opinion

SEA HAWK SEAFOODS, INC. v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2009No. S-13107PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal raises the question whether the State can waive its sovereign immunity through litigation conduct. After Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. obtained a final judgment against Valdez Fisheries Development Association, it alleged that Valdez Fisheries fraudulently conveyed millions of dollars to the State. The State litigated the case for almost ten years before it raised the defense of sovereign immunity. Although Sea Hawk maintained that the defense had been waived, the superior court dismissed Sea Hawk's fraudulent conveyance and conspiracy claims…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kolitch v. LindedahlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. State v. PhillipsAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State, Department of Corrections v. HeiseyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Lum v. KolesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Douglas Indian Association v. Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Tribes of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. McCrary v. Ivanof Bay VillageAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Calais Company, Inc. v. Kyzer IvyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API