Legal Opinion
Clements Mfg. Co. v. Eureka Vacuum Cleaner Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 6, 1932No. 5233PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is an action based on the alleged infringement of reissue patent No. 15,627, to George Clements, assignor by direct and mesne assignments of one-half to Clements Manufacturing Company, and one-half to the Hoover Company, for vacuum cleaner, reissued June 12,1923, on application filed April 30, 1923. Original patent No. 1,392,624, dated October 4, 1921, on application filed June 14, 1911.
The title of the plaintiffs is not questioned.
The defendant interposed the following defenses: Noninfringement, intervening rights as to claims added after reissue; invalidity as…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Clarage Fan Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1943