Legal Opinion
B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Clarage Fan Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided April 1, 1943No. Civil Action No. 121PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RAYMOND, District Judge.
Request has been made by plaintiff for an order under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 56(d), 28 U.S.C.A., following section 723c, specifying facts claimed to appear without substantial controversy upon the record on motion for summary judgment. The request specifies five points, the first three of which defendant does not contest, and an order will accordingly be entered to the effect that the patents involved are the same as those involved in the case of B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Massachusetts-Hair & Felt Co., 1 Cir., 122 F.2d 900, and Id., 1 Cir., 124 F.2d 95;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Massachusetts Hair & Felt Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Massachusetts Hair & Felt Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Kintner v. Atlantic Communication Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- American Metal Cap Co. v. Anchor Cap & Closure Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1921
- T. L. Smith Co. v. Cement Tile Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hydraulic Press Mfg. Co. v. Ralph N. Brodie Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1943