Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sneed v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1935No. 7548-7550Published

1DissentHutcheson, Circuit Judge

I cannot agree with my associates that the absence of indispensable parties requires the reversal of this decree. Such an objection does not go to the court’s jurisdiction as a federal court to hear a cause. Elmendorf v. Taylor, 10 Wheat. 152, 6 L. Ed. 289;1 Hazeltine Corp. v. White (C. C. A.) 68 F.(2d) 715; Dyer v. Stauffer (C. C. A.) 19 F.(2d) 922; General Inv. Co. v. N. Y. Central R. Co., 271 U. S. 228, 46 S. Ct. 496, 70 L. Ed. 920; Rose v. Saunders (C. C. A.) 69 F.(2d) 339; Edenbornv. Wigton (C. C. A.) 74 F.(2d) 374. It goes to the equity of its proceeding in it. It operates to. prevent…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  5. UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API