Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of McTevey
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided January 15, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions
•Pboceedixg- upon the probate of a will.
1Opinion of the Court
Ostrander, S.
—The deceased died at Mechanicville, Uovemher 13, 1914. She left a last will and testament dated June 9, 1914, which was admitted to probate March 19/1915. On the proceeding for probate another alleged will of the deceased was produced by DanielLearning, who appeared in person and by his attorney, Robert W. Fisher, in favor of said 1-ast mentioned will. In the decree for probate of the will of June 9, 1914, an allowance of costs was made to -said Learning. In the will of June 9, 1914, Oscar Warner was named as executor. _ Subsequently to the probate he renounced such appointment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wessels v. . BoettcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Hempsted v. White Sewing Machine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Hazard v. WilsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1877
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of FriedmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1924