Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Southern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 20, 1952No. 16595PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S'x'ukes, Justice.

This appeal is from a formal order overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint. In the latter it is alleged in substance that plaintiff’s suburban Orangeburg home is accessible only by the use of a highway or street which defendant’s tracks traverse. When plaintiff was moving into his home in October, 1949, the ’defendant blocked the street with railroad cars for about twenty-four hours which, in-ferably, were there for the uloading of shows for exhibition on the nearby county fair grounds. Plaintiff had his furniture exposed on an uncovered vehicle, for which there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Staton v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Baltzeger v. Car. Midland Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  3. South Bound R. R. v. BurtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Brown v. HendricksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Allen v. Union Oil & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Overcash v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Huggin v. Gaffney Development Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Gore v. SkipperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  4. Overcash v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Overcash v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API