Crosby v. Southern Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
S'x'ukes, Justice.
This appeal is from a formal order overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint. In the latter it is alleged in substance that plaintiff’s suburban Orangeburg home is accessible only by the use of a highway or street which defendant’s tracks traverse. When plaintiff was moving into his home in October, 1949, the ’defendant blocked the street with railroad cars for about twenty-four hours which, in-ferably, were there for the uloading of shows for exhibition on the nearby county fair grounds. Plaintiff had his furniture exposed on an uncovered vehicle, for which there…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Staton v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Baltzeger v. Car. Midland Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
- South Bound R. R. v. BurtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Brown v. HendricksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Allen v. Union Oil & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
3Cited by5 opinions
- Overcash v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Huggin v. Gaffney Development Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Gore v. SkipperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- Overcash v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Overcash v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005