Legal Opinion
In re Povill
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1939No. 33882PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
Motion to confirm referee’s report granting discharge.
There is opposition by the Peoples National Bank, a creditor whose claim has been expunged because barred by the Statute of Limitations, as announced in this proceeding in 2 Cir., 105 F.2d 157. That creditor urges that the court, of its own motion and in the public interest, should deny the motion.
Opposition is also voiced by the Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, on behalf of the Bank of United States in liquidation. That bank is a creditor, for its attorney deposes that a claim was filed in the sum of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re PovillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- In re RuhlmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Lerner v. First Wis. Nat. Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Mazur v. Hirsch Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Schlicht v. De GrootCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of Harold Laskin, Bankrupt. Harold Laskin, Industrial Rayon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963